Saturday, February 23, 2013
Justice KT.Thomas view on death penalty
I was going through few of the comments and except on person (kkg from
Bangalore) everyone was very critical of Justice Thomas. It will look
that all those who comments are very law abiding citizens and do not
commit any crimes at all. I can bet many of those at least if not all
will not hesitate to cross a red signal if policeman is not watching or
go by the no entry road without any feeling that they are breaking law.
It is the very same people who throw all garbage on the roads. They
don't have any compunction in breaking laws. When it comes to kill
someone judicially everyone shouts Yes Yes Kill him , Kill him. Many
times someone is punished on circumstantial evidence. It is not fool
proof. If someone goes to a house where a murder has happened and knocks
on door and getting no response comes out of gate and is observed by
someone, naturally he will be suspect. If he was a frequent visitor to
that house and his finger prints were on some door or balustrade or
things like that it will be confirmed. If the man has gone to pay some
debt and he returns with money as the door had not opened and if the
money is found on his person and also there is some record that the
murdered man had withdrawn a large amount on the same day the visitors
fate is sealed as per circumstantial evidence. The truth could be
something else. Someone who had some enmity with the murdered man had
gone earlier and had some altercation and killed him and finding the
other man dead run out of the house which no one noticed. The money the
murdered man had taken from bank must have been given to someone else
earlier in the day. In such a case due to circumstantial evidence the
wrong one will get punished. It is not due to any callousness on the
part of the judge. Only because all the evidence points against the
innocent victim. If such a person is sentenced to death, what a big
miscarriage of justice it will be. If he is punished for life, at least
the truth may be found out later. But once he is killed what is the use
of truth coming our later. In the case of the so called Rajiv Killers,
their participation is very very nominal. Buying some cell for making
bomb and like that. They did not have directly any involvement in the
actual murder. To treat them as murderers and kill them judicially is a
very grave injustice. So too the Veerappan aids. They are village folks
with no criminal records. They were recruited by Veerappan to assist
him. To judicially murder them is also a great mistake. It can never be a
case of 'rarest of rare'. And the irony is that those who used
Veerappan to amass wealth are roaming the country as great patriots and
leaders. Mr.Justice Thomas is hundred percent right and no one without
previous criminal history should be awarded death penalty. It will be a
great injustice to humanity.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment